Comments on: babies, babies everywhere http://pepperknit.com/blog/archives/153 Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:41:49 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: Rachel http://pepperknit.com/blog/archives/153#comment-295 Rachel Sun, 08 Jan 2006 09:41:00 +0000 http://pepperknit.com/blog/?p=153#comment-295 By the way, have you considered doing intarsia? No seamed edge (or stitches-picked-up) edge that way, and it would be a REALLY easy intarsia to do. Oh, if it helps, the baby blanket I made was 30" by 30" (I think) and used six balls of Crayon (I think) on size 6 needles (I think) in garter stitch (I'm sure). By the way, have you considered doing intarsia? No seamed edge (or stitches-picked-up) edge that way, and it would be a REALLY easy intarsia to do.

Oh, if it helps, the baby blanket I made was 30″ by 30″ (I think) and used six balls of Crayon (I think) on size 6 needles (I think) in garter stitch (I’m sure).

]]> By: Rachel http://pepperknit.com/blog/archives/153#comment-294 Rachel Sun, 08 Jan 2006 09:37:00 +0000 http://pepperknit.com/blog/?p=153#comment-294 Yeah, you have to go for the golden ratio -- much more soothing and pleasing to a baby than chaotic squares -- at least according to all the cool theories about the ways the golden ratio is pleasing to human perception. (In fact, I'm sure the baby doesn't care, but I still think it's a cool idea and the best choice.) Yeah, you have to go for the golden ratio — much more soothing and pleasing to a baby than chaotic squares — at least according to all the cool theories about the ways the golden ratio is pleasing to human perception. (In fact, I’m sure the baby doesn’t care, but I still think it’s a cool idea and the best choice.)

]]> By: Diana http://pepperknit.com/blog/archives/153#comment-293 Diana Sat, 07 Jan 2006 18:05:00 +0000 http://pepperknit.com/blog/?p=153#comment-293 I like the Fibonacci idea too. Me myself being slightly geeky (I designed a tote bag -still unfinished btw- using the aurean number -however it's called in English-). So yes, I'd go for it. Have you realized any square only touches four other squares, and you could make it using only five colours! And each square would only touch different colours *grin* I like the Fibonacci idea too. Me myself being slightly geeky (I designed a tote bag -still unfinished btw- using the aurean number -however it’s called in English-). So yes, I’d go for it. Have you realized any square only touches four other squares, and you could make it using only five colours! And each square would only touch different colours *grin*

]]> By: Laura http://pepperknit.com/blog/archives/153#comment-292 Laura Sat, 07 Jan 2006 16:43:00 +0000 http://pepperknit.com/blog/?p=153#comment-292 Hey! I read that book! I like the Fibonacci rectangle for the blanket. The Crayon might be an excellent yarn choice -- are you thinking of using it? Hey! I read that book! I like the Fibonacci rectangle for the blanket. The Crayon might be an excellent yarn choice — are you thinking of using it?

]]>